Cristina NualART

Tag: Education

Art, Cultural Mediation and Diversity


In Madrid from 12-16 September 2016, European research teams from universities, museums and community organizations met at the conference Art, Cultural Mediation and Diversity. Divercity: diversity in the musem and the city.

This week-long conference has two parts to it. Panels of speakers show images and videos and speak of their work. The conference also includes participative sessions, where instead of a more formal, seated, exchange of knowledge and examples, we take part in activities such as those one might do with a museum, a school, a social refuge, or a cultural centre. Alongside people from all corners of Europe, who work in places from prestigious museums to women’s refuges, we explored personal connections to public art, practiced methods to encourage empathy, and improvised creative responses to confront stereotypes.

I don’t know if I would have thought of it had I been involved in planning a conference on this topic, but it seems obvious in retrospect that a stencil workshop is a great thing to offer. I enjoyed all talks and activities, but I really went into that wonderful flow mode while making my stencil.


My stencil work, with a Janus head intended to be turned upside down.

Urban guerrilla warfare was not the aim of the workshop, but by showing how to draw, cut and spray a piece of stencil art, the seeds are planted for us to contemplate inserting stenciled image-messages into cities. I don’t feel any desperate need ‘to be heard’ by the city, so personally I’m not planning to spray my thoughts on brick walls just yet. Instead, I went for the wearables market, and sprayed my message on a shopping bag. Thus, my message will be advertised from my person, as and when I choose to silently shout out in the public sphere.



The making of Death of the Arteacher, by Cristina Nualart.


Death of the Arteacher is the little sentence I came up with to sum up a lot of the ideas churning in my head as I reflect on art education, something that for years I’ve been involved with in multifaceted ways. I reference Barthes’ Death of the Author, with its suggestions that readers (or by implication, viewers) have agency in a meaning-making process. My message also comments on some stereotypes that weight on art educators, unfairly assumed, sometimes, to be not very skilled/talented/’useful’, either by ‘professional’ artists or by the public at large. (In a future blog post I will cover some funny anecdotes from my personal experiences).

An important overarching fact that transpires from the conference presentations is that institutions, in this case mostly art museums, are continuously reaching out to NGOs and grass roots or social organizations to get ‘diverse’ people involved in their activities. There is clearly an institutional drive to look for people who may be at risk of social exclusion and to set up initiatives specifically for these people to take part in. Many of the conference speakers were constantly improving and/or questioning their review systems and ways of evaluating their work and getting feedback to help ascertain the impact it may have had.

Social change is often a slow process, and no one is deluded that any cultural project is going to make radical improvements to the social fabric, but the feeling amongst conference participants is that these small changes that are activated by one person doing something in collaboration with a museum’s education department will bring long term benefits to that person and those in their circle. If the start of social change is merely that the elitist aura that hangs over museums is dispersing, that alone, we can imagine, is going to improve the world a little bit.

Another commonality is that large institutions are increasingly reaching out, working outside of the museum walls and taking their staff to the periphery of the city, or simply working in a public space which may be perceived as ‘neutral’ or has a connection to the participants of a project.

No institution works in vacuum; ideas cross-pollinate; museums and schools feed off each other. Given that museums seem to be increasingly developing similar projects to those offered by schools and other education providers, the question that I reflect on is what is the role of the museum, beyond the obviously great work of making art less ‘scary’ and more inclusive. I ask myself if museums shouldn’t be aiming to create situations where the various canons and power structures of the museum itself are questioned. In no way wishing to demean the value of any educational programme in a museum, my question did raise a few feathers among some panelists, but one beautiful answer was simple: that is the next step, but first we do we need to get people from all sectors of society comfortable enough with art and museums that such a question can be debated. We shall all keep working and reflecting on this!

YouTube channel on one of the feminist research projects: Madrid Ciudad de las Mujeres

The Divercity word play  reminds me of DomestiCity, my photo essay on domestic use of public space Vietnam (and some unusual examples of domestic work in private spaces).






Art: the useless profession for curious people

The artist network, a-n, kindly sent me a kilo of a book on art education to read over the summer and comment on. The review of the book is here.  The word limit for the review meanst that there is no room for some of the nice little sentences about being an artist  that I underlined. Below are quotes by some of the artists who contributed to the book, whose views I subscribe to:

  • ‘Credentials don’t exist in art, it’s the work you’re doing, and how it makes sense at the time you are doing it, or maybe later on. Even that’s not decided… ’ John Armleder
  • ‘We don’t have to call artists “artists” anymore, they can be anything… It’s a slightly politicized thing: are they just like everyone else? Well of course we’re just like everyone else, it’s just that we have this desire to make visible things that usually aren’t visible, and therefore it’s a kind of useless profession.’ Phyllida Barlow
  • ‘Art is a kind of job that no one asks you to do. You become an artist for all sorts of reasons, but when I examined my soul, I think I’ve probably become an artist out of curiosity.’ Pavel Büchler
  • ‘As a culture we don’t spend enough time looking and describing, articulating what we see, because there is so much ambiguity now.’ Graham Crowley
  • ‘What art really does, is it redevelops notions of success. I’m suspicious of commercial success, If people are able to withstand current, dominating notions of traditional success,for me that’s successful.’ Rainer Ganahl


Sculpture + 2D

RachelThorby_photocnualartI came across this bust by Rachel Thorlby in Madder139 gallery, and I was pleasantly intrigued by the Cervantian look of the man, but mostly attracted to the 2D image collaged over the 3D surface.

I used the same technique on this little maquette of a woman that I prepared a few years ago for a workshop on feminist art with underprivileged teenage girls. Cheap, easy and effective, I thought – considering the educational outcome of my task. Seeing Thorlby’s work, I now pause to consider the concept of a flat image on a lumpy object, and I am artistically amused 🙂



Art connaisseurship

There’s a Spanish saying that I really like, deformación profesional, which is used to explain the angle on vision that our career’s impose on all other spheres of our lives. You would often use the expression to excuse a language slip, for example, if you had just used specialist jargon in a laypersons conversation. It highlights the fact that one’s profession is closely link to one’s identity (as questionable as that may be).

A few days ago, whilst waiting around in a corridor of a public building, I overhead a few people making casual conversation. The topic was the large canvas with lots of white cracked paint and some washes of grey and red, with a few other small patches of colour. I tried to blend into the wallpaper to hear this exchange in which one woman dismissed it as completely worthless, whilst another said the splotch of red looked like blood. I smiled when I head the unsurprising retort: ‘they charge thousands for something like that in a museum’ (little does she know that ‘thousands’ is an understatement).

The painting was not a well known one, nor was it by any famous artists, yet still I found it quite beautiful and interesting to look at, and skillful. And that’s when I knew that -although I have a large circle of friends and colleagues who are not ‘into’ art- I still have in my day-to-day life enough intellectual input on art that I have become a ‘deformed professional’, a person who is so imbued in a field that I can no longer see it from the outside. I continued eavesdropping, refreshed and excited at the thought that these laypeople were helping me see this canvas from the ‘why should it be valued at all?’ point of view. It got better. Along came a man who self-assuredly offered his interpretation of the painting, pointing as he said: ‘that is the Icelandic cloud of volcanic ash, there’s a field and there’s a city and there are no aeroplanes in the big white sky’!

The flippant comment not only added to my pondering on art-connaisseurship in the popular realm, but also made me consider art as a medium to portray current affairs. My mate Paul Shinn drew this version of the Iceland volcano. See his blog for other illustrations on current affairs.

51_MetroPop art is not around us like it used to, though. Like millions on London Transport, on Thursday this week I grabbed a copy of Metro magazine to forget that enjoying the journey requires paying attention to it. As I flipped through the daily news, I found this article on art made by a 10 year old boy, pretentiously labelled a ‘young Picasso’, complete with neckscarf and black beret (très chic).

Well, it is Metro and not Art Monthly, but even so, have people generally got such a  poor understanding of art that they confuse these colourful images with Cubism? I’m shocked – especially considering that Cubism is a die-hard topic in GCSE art.

To add insult to injury, some mugs have paid over £600 for some of this boy’s paintings. In art market terms, that’s nothing, but considering that we are actually talking about a child who does vibrant paintings, well, get real. Buy yourself a couple of hand-made prints at the Affordable Art Fair and let this kid be a kid and not a gimmicky money-making trick. Look around at what children do naturally: those that have the privilege of owning paper and finger paints (not those poor slaves of Nintendos and PSPs…) do this kind of stuff all the time. It’s great, but it’s only mums, dads and grandparents who should want to own it.

Unless otherwise specified, text and images © 2017 Cristina Nualart

Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Welcome to my little home on the world wide digital jungle. Previous versions of this site, with different designs and URLs, have existed since 2002.
You'll be delighted -even surprised- that this site does not brainwash you with advertising, bake cookies or spy on your digital data.
This site is also low in bullshit (excuse my colourful language...) due to a personal aversion to it.

Back to top